MUTUALdecision Home

MUTUALdecision Blog

Dedicated to mutual fund investors.

International Investing in The Age of Turbulence

Alan Greenspan writes extensively about the global economy in The Age of Turbulence
He believes there are common dominators to economic success. One is a cultural desire for growth, which includes government integrity, the acceptance of a certain amount of income inequality, incentives to take risk and the willingness to let market forces determine supply and demand. Markets are the antithesis of government decision making. The fall of Russian communism showed the fallacy of central planning. The socialism of Western Europe and the populism of Latin America are lesser forms of substituting the wisdom of government for the marketplace. Western Europe (India and elsewhere) suffers from bureaucracies with extensive approval processes which slowdown change and bureaucrats who substitute their judgment for the market. Restrictive work rules imposed on employers drive up costs and reduce the incentive to take risk, resulting in lower growth and, perversely, higher unemployment.
 
A second factor in economic growth is education. It speaks for itself. A third is a young, or growing, population.  Workers who save money (accumulate capital) and contribute to their heath and retirement plans aid economic growth. Non-workers, such as retirees, who consume these services, which have been promised to them by their government but have not been funded, place a strain on economic growth. As the ratio of workers to retirees shifts, due to the aging of the baby boomers and increases in longevity, the burden of these transfer payments on an economy/society increases.
 
The last determinate of economic prosperity is a strong rule of law, defined as a protection of property rights (and, by extension, individual rights). This is a major theme of Mr. Greenspan’s. Property rights include real estate, intellectual property, goods and, broadly, commercial transactions.  A strong rule of law is not a dictatorship, in fact, it’s just the opposite.  Individuals/companies will take risk, and invest for the future, if they can see a clear and consistent set of rules. As a corollary, risk premiums will be lower in this environment, meaning the cost of capital will be lower, promoting growth.
 
 We can extrapolate from Mr. Greenspan’s thinking as to the best international areas for investment.   So let’s go for an around the world tour. Western Europe has a strong rule of law but their bureaucracies, aging population, restrictive immigration which could otherwise offset an aging population, and expensive social services means their economic growth will be limited. Eastern Europe is on its way to a well developed rule of law and does not suffer from the problems of Western Europe (yet). It’s overcoming its Communist legacy and production costs are low.
 
Russia has inconsistently applied laws which vary with the whim of its rulers. It also has the Western European population demographics. A currency inflated by the high price of oil and gas exports is another limiting factor. However, abundant natural resources, an entrepreneurial spirit, and burgeoning consumer market are positives. Russia has great potential but equally great obstacles to overcome. 
 
Japan has greater population problems than Western Europe in terms of age and immigration and a bureaucracy structured to prevent companies from failing, limiting imports, and preventing foreign companies from operating in Japan. Yes, it has a strong rule of law but it is very Japan-centric. Is it any wonder that the Japanese economy has been stagnant for the last 15 years? Mr. Greenspan says that it will no longer be the world’s second largest economy by 2030. 
 
China is the global wildcard. Its growth has been impressive and it has moved towards a comprehensive rule of law.  But a Western-style rule of law and the personal freedom which it, and economic growth, brings are in conflict with a ruling autocratic party. One or the other will have to give way at some point.   Mr. Greenspan believes that China’s growth will continue, and although he doesn’t come out and say it, China will surpass Japan in GDP by 2030.
 
India has a strong rule of law but a bureaucracy which makes Western Europe’s look like a Ferrari. Its growth has been impressive but it hasn’t kept up with China due to severe infrastructure problems and cultural crosscurrents preventing its markets from freely functioning. Latin America is cursed with populism (take a look at Venezuela), Brazil being the possible exception. Severe income inequality, education and rule of law (government instability and corruption) problems abound.
 
Emerging economies, Mr. Greenspan cites Vietnam, are where the biggest money will be made. Of course, they carry great risk.  Nonetheless it will be exciting to see new economic hotspots emerge as the world looks for low cost production areas and certain counties seize the opportunity. Lastly, the United States looks pretty good by comparison to the rest of the world, despite our problems. Mr. Greenspan predicts we’ll still be the biggest and the best in 2030, although a smaller part of a bigger global pie. 
 
How do you invest globally? Stick with Mr. Greenspan and go with a strong rule of law. Invest in Europe, East over West and, if you can take more risk, invest in China and India. Constantly look for changes in law, or a shift in attitude towards a change, and watch for emerging gems.
 
Posted 10/10/07 by Bill Byrnes

Mr. Greenspan's Investments

In The Age of Turbulence, Alan Greenspan outlines his vision for the world, and particularly the United States, between now and 2030. He chose 2030 because that’s when the last of the baby boomers reach age 65 – retirement. And the impact the baby boomers have on the world’s economy as they shift from being producers to consumers of capital is a major theme of his book. (If you don’t want to read it all, chapter 25 summarizes his arguments and predictions.)
 
In 2030, Mr. Greenspan forecasts the real U.S. GDP will be 75% greater than today. That may sound like a big number but it’s only 2.5% annual compound growth – well within historical norms. That’s the good news. The bad news is forecasted increases in inflation and, correspondingly, long term interest rates. Inflation could rise to the 4-5% level and long term U.S. Treasuries to 8-9% yields due to stresses caused, in part, by rising social security, Medicare and other federally mandated health care payments. Mr. Greenspan also points out that if Treasury yields rise (today, 30 year Treasuries are yielding less than 5%), risk premiums on other investments, such as stocks and real estate, will increase. If such adjustments were to occur rapidly, it would result in deceasing prices for those assets. Occurring over a longer period of time, the investments would grow in value but not as quickly as if the risk premium remained unchanged. 
 
What do Mr. Greenspan’s predictions mean for investors? Stocks, real estate, and short-term bonds. Assume the risk premium for stocks increases, and using Mr. Greenspan’s parameters, the forward P/E on the stock market could fall from its present 15 to 12.   However, the real growth in GDP will more than offset this decrease. In 2030, the stock market would still be 60% higher than today in real terms.   In normal dollars the market would be even higher because it reflects moderate rates of inflation. Sounds like a good place for long term investors.
 
Real estate also does well in periods of real growth and moderate inflation. The value of residential (notwithstanding the current downward adjustment in that market) and commercial real tend to track real growth. Hard assets, such as real estate, also increase in value due to inflation.  You can lose money if you own a home or building in a declining area (Detroit comes to mind) but overall real estate investors will fare well under Mr. Greenspan’s scenario. I suggest you invest in commercial real estate through real estate funds which focus on real estate investments trusts (see Yielding to REITs).
 
Long term bonds should be avoided. They go down in value when interest rates rise. Of course, you can hold a bond until maturity and get your principal back but its real value will be reduced by the amount of inflation that occurred over your holding period. And, if the coupon/interest payment doesn’t provide an after-tax return in excess of inflation, that’s a double whammy. The current yield curve is essentially flat. Treasury yields are approximately: One moth, 3.40%; 5 year, 4.00% and 30 year, 4.80%. We will see a much steeper curve if inflation and interest rates are expected to, or do, rise. With the current flat yield curve, and Mr. Greenspan’s expectations, the only safe fixed income investments are those with short maturities, TIPs (Treasury inflation-protected bonds) and, for the higher risk investor, collateralized loan and adjustable-rate mortgage pools.
Posted 10/03/07 by Bill Byrnes